179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Shawn Travalent
Date:
Mon, 14 Feb 94 09:32:58 CST
Subject:
Re: valid IDM posts?
Mbox:
idm.9402.gz
On Sun, 13 Feb 94 18:18:58 EST, WILL-E wrote:
quoted 9 lines I hate to be the one to bring it up but I've been contemplating for the>I hate to be the one to bring it up but I've been contemplating for the >past few minutes whether or not I should post here asking about the new >Silent Records ambient compilation: From Here To Tranquility Volume 2 >but I've been thinking that it's not related to Intelligent Dance Music (IDM) >primarily because it's not dance music for a start... but then something >like this comes up which really makes me wonder what happened to the >inital purpose of this mailing list. Can we discuss what subjects are >valid for discussion on here and restrict ourselves to it? >
OK Will-e your point about the vending whatever is well taken..but i have to disagree when it comes to narrowly defining the scope of the music that can be discussed on idm. First, like most folks, i'm certain that quite a few listen to very eclectic types of musics. Therefore i can say with reaonable certainty that most people will not mind reading reviews on music that you may deem on the fringe of YOUR DEFINITION of idm. Which brings me to another point, what makes you think that everyone will be able to agree on a satisfactory definition idm. And even if we were to have a working definition would the next step be to "blacklist" certain groups because they aren't dancy enough? But, wait that won't work because these musicians do not work in a vaccuum so maybe some of their tracks will be acceptable while others will not. Yes, perhaps that's it, we can discuss "Perpetual Dawn" because it made WILL-E move but we cannot discuss "Huge Pulsating Brain That Rules the ....". Or did you start to move a little when the bass kicked in? Well, Shit, maybe we can talk about parts of "Huge Pulsating Brain...." lets say the beat driven part from 8:15 to 10:45 . OK ? I hope you get my point. I don't mean to run you down, but truth be known...I don't even think we want to waste time defining the music we love. The descriptiions are never accurate and they just create more useless e-mail. You may be able to technically pinpoint a track but you can never describe the feeling of experiencining the purity of emotion when listening to sounds you have never heard before. Furthermore, i don't give a shit what your definition of idm may be. Get off your high horse and learn the truth ..... your definiton will be limiting and counterproductive. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Peace, Guido For all your R&D needs... ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^travalen@kcmetro.cc.mo.us^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^home of The Private Conspiracy (Shhhh!)^^^^^ ^^the Deep Thought Council^^